+1 for graduation.

Craig

On Oct 14, 2007, at 11:39 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:

> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>>> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>>> I would like to see the legal stuff resolved first.  I don't  
>>>> believe
>>>> that we should release a project with existing copyright  
>>>> issues.  If
>>>> this were to mean that stdcxx graduation would wait until  
>>>> November's
>>>> Board meeting, I'd be comfortable with that.  How extensive is the
>>>> issue, and how long will it take to complete?
>>> It's not a 'copyright issue' per se (as all the paperwork is in
>>> place), but rather ensuring the license headers follow the currently
>>> recommended template.  Many of our other projects don't follow the
>>> templates - and, yes, this will be a blocker for a release - but I
>>> don't think it needs to hold up graduation.
>> Is it just a matter of the current template versus an older one?  Is
>> everything properly under at least some form of the ASF license  
>> header?  It
>> seems that it should be a rather straightforward and mechanical  
>> item to
>> clear up.
>
> I agree, and I believe these concerns have been addressed. The record
> of changes made to resolve this issue can be found here (the specific
> patches are referenced in the subtasks):
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-552
>
> Martin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!