incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason van Zyl <ja...@maven.org>
Subject Re: Apache Composer Proposal
Date Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:59:20 GMT
There didn't seem to be any curfuffle at all in floating the proposal  
through the incubator. That's a good thing. Both containers are  
heavily used, both originate from these parts and so it's somewhat  
fitting they would like to return. I'll put up vote thread later today.

On 8 Oct 07, at 9:54 AM 8 Oct 07, peter royal wrote:

> On Oct 8, 2007, at 6:54 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> I am watching http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal  
>> with some
>> interest.  A couple of items:
>>
>>   1) JAMES uses Phoenix, which is the old name for Plexus
>
> yes, Loom was unsuccessful Phoenix fork. iirc, Plexus borrowed  
> concepts from Fortress more, but was mostly an independent  
> implementation
>
>>   2) What about Apache Excalibur, currently home to the various
>>      Avalon modules (framework, components, etc.)?
>
> Excalibur can continue on as-is.. iirc, Excalibur had made  
> movements to have some of its components be framework agnostic? If  
> so, they'd run in Composer. (the Composer component model is likely  
> going to be very much like pico's, which just runs with pojo's)
>
> -pete
>
>
> -- 
> proyal@apache.org - http://fotap.org/~osi
>
>
>

Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder,  Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message