incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Marino <>
Subject Re: Graduate Tuscany as a top level project
Date Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:14:58 GMT

On Oct 23, 2007, at 6:43 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:

> Noel,
> <decloak>
> I was there when it happened. It was actually the other way
> around..Short story, the "independents" had trouble letting anyone
> else work or suggest ideas which went against their own mental model
> of how things should be. When i argued for a middle path vociferously,
> they left.
> </decloak>
> -- dims

I was simply trying to clear up a point of ambiguity with respect to  
my (and by extension my employer's) involvement in Tuscany. I was  
hoping to avoid digging up the past, which doesn't serve good purposes.

Were the independents completely intransigent or were the others  
inflexible? Sometimes people just have different goals and  
reconciliation doesn't work because things are too far apart. I and  
the others working on the SCA Java implementation left the project  
because there was constant friction and differences of opinion, and  
we felt it best for the two camps to go their separate ways. I  
previously explained my motivations here:

Unfortunately, I don't have much time to follow Tuscany closely  
although I do check the lists occasionally. It does seem both it and  
our community (Fabric3) have a lot less friction and are growing  
nicely. Sometimes communities just diverge based on differences of  
opinion, technical or otherwise, and trying to villainize one group  
is the wrong approach since it is not constructive.

I wish Tuscany luck as I work closely with some of those involved in  
the project on the SCA specifications and have a lot of technical and  
personal respect for them.


> On 10/23/07, Noel J. Bergman <> wrote:
>> Matthieu Riou wrote:
>>> they did welcome enough independent committers while being in the
>>> incubator
>>> Attracting a large quantity of independent developers while being
>>> in the incubator is pretty hard
>> Yes, but it seems to be emerging that there *were* more  
>> independents, and
>> they have left to work actively elsewhere (as indicated by Jim  
>> Marino for
>> BEA).  Is this an indicator that the community wasn't able to  
>> embrace the
>> interests of more than one vendor?  Since SCA is a standard, why  
>> was there a
>> need to fork the implementation?
>>         --- Noel
>> P.S.  I've removed [VOTE], since Ant indicates that the vote is  
>> being tabled
>> for now.
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> -- 
> Davanum Srinivas ::
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message