Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27913 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2007 10:56:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Sep 2007 10:56:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 21669 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2007 10:56:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21518 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2007 10:56:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21507 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2007 10:56:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:56:11 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ant.elder@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.238 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.238] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.238) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:56:12 +0000 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h30so2365159wxd for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:55:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=VWvPoALWRr4v8Rl+kUSz5Rzm8pb8IpPjfVnoAVPqquE=; b=gFnGkaunctDhVPwdVcZbPcYzXpQkdTfEBjTJBc8kbpwIQU6MWlFAjQXX7nbM6+rqD1zBBRlkb4QWLQJ95eIQF2STbzsvxwLHoKvX03WFGNSXLtbKnHXDV/RlhkE13H1EOGdK/xwQCAxiFchu38u7NFCUGA6UngFKnvYO47fe+X8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=mX2FsoPa7f7wp86Yd5f6e7mLsXAbP0l6jQywqCfqnMdM5vAixOo+VlVFbnnPqD9doiEmT+/QypmD5Ixi23cpDTMKLikAjXspXFlOE6pPqgoM6EcYngxbkRFVnImYRK5Mag8W4ynPNDRciI0TKnekePM2GBToMvaAf+boXYxnCXQ= Received: by 10.70.18.11 with SMTP id 11mr3259669wxr.1190976950543; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:55:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.37.3 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:55:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <71e1b5740709280355h5de2dfa6v113b80753b689ead@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:55:50 +0100 From: "ant elder" Reply-To: antelder@apache.org To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: How strict should podling release reviews be? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_47_25305711.1190976950531" References: <71e1b5740709271403n1c794ceaja362fdd47673c9b9@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_47_25305711.1190976950531 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 9/28/07, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > On 9/28/07, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > > > What we care about is that podlings get the "legal stuff" right, and > > letting releases out without this being ok is not an option, due to > > potential legal risks. > > I thought projects in incubator were not endorsed by the ASF, hence > the ASF could not be responsible for the legal stuff in podling > releases... Did I miss something here ? This is exactly the question i'm trying to clarify. The policy at http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases says: - No release made by a Podling will be endorsed by the ASF - (releases) SHALL NOT occur until all source has been legally transferred to the ASF. - the release archive MUST contain the word "incubating" in the filename - the release archive MUST contain an Incubation disclaimer and that seems to imply there is no constraint that every podling release MUST met all the legal requirements expected of a non-incubating ASF release. ...ant ------=_Part_47_25305711.1190976950531--