From general-return-15711-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Fri Sep 14 23:56:05 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 2640 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2007 23:56:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Sep 2007 23:56:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 8735 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2007 23:55:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8588 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2007 23:55:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8577 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2007 23:55:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:55:51 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.242 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.242] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:55:49 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b33so147466ana for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:55:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=7gCL9scIv666CxR55Tp8sV/lV+3p3PXMEFc7N9NVSFI=; b=abCfK1OUHwKHEXGMcJO+qSmz5b1MPqatnYCcgObHgdm9FIs8jU21dRoN5S8rD5fEfhDR/Ogl/HZvXscyNwvTOK/aZfXj1lMis52Nb5HdvghHt9G7wdh5YE8ICnWTZ0J5TuTC7sC6WOaSGIz+0N+7BDkw17JG2Ua+4jK4vfdQtak= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=Rg6OrxDyhyWrgspFPdJSzpz7P5KA/S7gGTkle9JSXR9rzIOxO+Jc6P8F7DcWdUVz09mwyDRM66/AizeRTQ2viZnU1wGSq9/w4ZNh65XXR7rS+YiFL40Q6F85NpeP9fOr7rJ/cZCLwo925mozhxguwRYCnzU6tyJBiKq3vmKyUBE= Received: by 10.100.47.9 with SMTP id u9mr3580025anu.1189814128731; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.1.200? ( [76.182.118.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h13sm1497556wxd.2007.09.14.16.55.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <33e260400709141226l6c7f5539p6ab3199c15d6045b@mail.gmail.com> References: <33e260400709141226l6c7f5539p6ab3199c15d6045b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2-1053519785 Message-Id: <698AF826-4064-4B8B-9D6E-B1BE947B6D46@gmail.com> From: Kevan Miller Subject: Re: Export Notification - Using BouncyCastle in Tuscany Rel 1.0 Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:55:17 -0400 To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-2-1053519785 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Sep 14, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote: > Hi, > > We are using Apache Rampart 1.3 to enable ws security into the ws- > binding-axis2 module for Apache Tuscany v1.0 which we hope to > release in a week. Using Rampart seems to bring in the > Bouncycastle dependency for encryption functions. I have followed > the instructions on http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html#sources > and I have attached the patch in this mail to include Tuscany to > the matrix on http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/. I have also > run the xsl and the generated mail sample is also attached in this > mail. > > Could somebody please help with reviewing and applying the patch. > Also, is there anything else to do with this other than the mention > on the Distro README which we will do. There was a discussion earlier this year about Tuscany, BouncyCastle, and a patented IDEA algorithm implemented by BouncyCastle -- http:// mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200702.mbox/% 3c8044E00A-9746-4ECC-9104-F6AF96731FC5@yahoo.com%3e Here's some background information -- http://mail-archives.apache.org/ mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200508.mbox/%3C1AB1C8BD- B886-43C3-8D54-47B558B6DD66@apache.org%3E Did the Tuscany project reach a decision about the patented IDEA algorithm in BouncyCastle? --kevan --Apple-Mail-2-1053519785--