incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.1.1 (2nd try)
Date Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:35:49 GMT
Just a friendly reminder that we're still missing an IPMC vote ;-)
Thanks !

Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I have fixed the LICENSE with the missing informations
> and redeployed a release to the same staging area.
> Hopefully we will find a better way to handle the license informations
> (I've seen some generated informations using maven) for the next major
> release and fix the generated license files somehow.
>
> Could everyone quickly review the changes ?
> I won't start a new vote as only the LICENSE file has
> changed, but I can if someone objects.
>
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
>   
>> On 5/29/07, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>     
>>> robert burrell donkin wrote:
>>>       
>>>> On 5/28/07, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Just a friendly reminder.  We're missing anoter IPMC vote ...
>>>>>           
>>>> issues
>>>> -------
>>>>
>>>> i think that apache-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.tar.gz has some
>>>> libraries in lib that are missing their LICENSE/NOTICE entries (eg
>>>> howl, jencks)
>>>>         
>>> There are licensed under ASL 2.0 and don't have any NOTICE file afaik.
>>>       
>> cool
>>
>>     
>>> Should all the jars be listed in the LICENSE / NOTICE file ? My
>>> assumption
>>> was that only those who had some attributions somehow or with a
>>> different license
>>> need to be, but correct me if I'm wrong.
>>>       
>> it is safe to release without listing them (and if this were the only
>> issue then i would probably have voted affirmatively)
>>
>> but the aim should be to allow people to understand the licensing of
>> releases without need to ask questions or do research. if i don't
>> understand the licensing then i will ask. so, it's a good idea to note
>> the licenses for all jars since it avoids the need to answer questions
>> like this...
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>     
>>>> otherwise generally ok but i have a few questions
>>>>
>>>> source in
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/org/apache/servicemix/samples/wsdl-first/wsdl-first-jsr181-su/3.1.1-incubating/
>>>
>>>       
>>>> lacks headers. is this going to be released? if so, are these
>>>> generated?
>>>>
>>>> are the jars under
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/ going to
>>>> be released?
>>>>
>>>> servicemix-wsn2005-3.1.1-incubating-sources.jar contains lots of java
>>>> sources without headers (mostly under
>>>> org.apache.servicemix.wsn.jaxws). is this going to be released? if so,
>>>> are these generated?
>>>>         
>>> Yeah, lots of these files are generated.  Files generated are not in svn
>>> so we usually check the headers on the svn tree rather than the source
>>> jars generated by maven.  These jars are not meant to be built for only
>>> contain all the java sources for debugging purposes.   If you want to
>>> build these jars, you need to use the source distribution or use the svn
>>> tag.
>>>       
>> fine
>>
>> i hope to be a bit more prompt with the review next time
>>
>> - robert
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
>   

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message