incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.1.1 (2nd try)
Date Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:04:23 GMT
I have fixed the LICENSE with the missing informations
and redeployed a release to the same staging area.
Hopefully we will find a better way to handle the license informations
(I've seen some generated informations using maven) for the next major
release and fix the generated license files somehow.

Could everyone quickly review the changes ?
I won't start a new vote as only the LICENSE file has
changed, but I can if someone objects.

robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 5/29/07, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> robert burrell donkin wrote:
>> > On 5/28/07, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Just a friendly reminder.  We're missing anoter IPMC vote ...
>> >
>> > issues
>> > -------
>> >
>> > i think that apache-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.tar.gz has some
>> > libraries in lib that are missing their LICENSE/NOTICE entries (eg
>> > howl, jencks)
>> There are licensed under ASL 2.0 and don't have any NOTICE file afaik.
>
> cool
>
>> Should all the jars be listed in the LICENSE / NOTICE file ? My
>> assumption
>> was that only those who had some attributions somehow or with a
>> different license
>> need to be, but correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> it is safe to release without listing them (and if this were the only
> issue then i would probably have voted affirmatively)
>
> but the aim should be to allow people to understand the licensing of
> releases without need to ask questions or do research. if i don't
> understand the licensing then i will ask. so, it's a good idea to note
> the licenses for all jars since it avoids the need to answer questions
> like this...
>
> <snip>
>
>> > otherwise generally ok but i have a few questions
>> >
>> > source in
>> >
>> http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/org/apache/servicemix/samples/wsdl-first/wsdl-first-jsr181-su/3.1.1-incubating/
>>
>> >
>> > lacks headers. is this going to be released? if so, are these
>> > generated?
>> >
>> > are the jars under
>> > http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/ going to
>> > be released?
>> >
>> > servicemix-wsn2005-3.1.1-incubating-sources.jar contains lots of java
>> > sources without headers (mostly under
>> > org.apache.servicemix.wsn.jaxws). is this going to be released? if so,
>> > are these generated?
>> Yeah, lots of these files are generated.  Files generated are not in svn
>> so we usually check the headers on the svn tree rather than the source
>> jars generated by maven.  These jars are not meant to be built for only
>> contain all the java sources for debugging purposes.   If you want to
>> build these jars, you need to use the source distribution or use the svn
>> tag.
>
> fine
>
> i hope to be a bit more prompt with the review next time
>
> - robert
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message