Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of matthieu.riou@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.82.236 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=NEwxpVjlsQU4vKRxOH98460Q9pxXNwxs+h25baNW57cxc2XEO9wozqdftZID/4veZ421psTQbXUbofYpwWNsu1VQH9nLjyVJ+hXuZCue+sRfpmYPdXyw0Jh7WQBD3hGsETDMxe+GGzxYFrR41x43oZesj57rx516y1mD6Fp6J2E=
Message-ID: <fbdc6a970705281308m7b037a4fybeb139f4c077203@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 13:08:12 -0700
From: "Matthieu Riou" <matthieu.riou@gmail.com>
Reply-To: matthieu.riou@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODE 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f470f68e0705280529x2f9adf28k69ab9cb42d2db07e@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_76119_12623832.1180382892758"
References: <fbdc6a970705151127x5df3ff27wf3b64ea97c6ebcc3@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f470f68e0705171527p21ceae18j1f722b533bbf014b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <fbdc6a970705172032k54e03965ga06707b618107ab@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4657E5F5.80208@opensource.lk>
	 <fbdc6a970705260858p4dcd2748y4ac7fe58c76d14b4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <71e1b5740705280421o22054833m91bba3ee4c003bb8@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f470f68e0705280529x2f9adf28k69ab9cb42d2db07e@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_76119_12623832.1180382892758
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I'll remember that for the next release. Thanks for the clarification!

Matthieu

On 5/28/07, robert burrell donkin <robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/28/07, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
> > "When a distribution contains code under several licenses, the LICENSE
> file
> > should contain details of all these licenses. For each component which
> is
> > not Apache licensed, details of the component and the license under
> which
> > the component is distributed should be appended to the LICENSE file."
> >
> > See:
> >
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses
>
> true
>
> however, this is not policy but "best practice"/"strongly
> recommendation"/"likely to become policy". it is likely that if
> detailed policy were ever felt necessary then this would be the
> policy.
>
> (yes, it is confusing: this is the price for keeping formal policy to
> a minimum)
>
> AIUI licenses for other code must be distributed. providing that
> project adopts a clear organisation which allows people to easily find
> out the license for each document distributed that's ok by me.
>
> (maybe cliff will jump in here with comments if i've misunderstood
> anything)
>
> - robert
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

------=_Part_76119_12623832.1180382892758--