On 4/4/07, Niclas Hedhman <niclas@hedhman.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 April 2007 11:10, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> > Is it standard practice to take the existing PPMC forward to the
> > board or can the project, in its discretion, suggest a PMC made
> > up of a different group of members?
>
> The 'standard' practice is that the PPMC is moved forward to the new TLP
> project's PMC. It has also been 'standard' that the committers are kept
> as-is. However, some communities have arranged for 'clean up' operations
> prior to the graduation proposal in collaboration with the Incubator PMC.
> AFAIK, this is done in discussion with the people involved to limit any bad
> feelings. End of the day, the purpose has been to keep the 'active'
> community. But there are no policy in place (AFAIK).
> Discussions has occured whether 'previous to ASF active' people should be
> committers or not. I don't think there are any definite conclusion on that,
> and handled case by case.

+1

though not a requirement, if the lists don't tally questions may be
asked and explanations made which takes time. so, i recommend a quick
tidy up operation on the PPMC so that the final list is the same as
the proposal list.

- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org