incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ted Husted" <hus...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating
Date Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:03:36 GMT
+1 (binding)

I'll bring this up on the iBATIS.NET list and Spring.NET lists, which
we also use.

-Ted.

On 4/17/07, George Aroush <george@aroush.net> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Please help us to get our first official Lucene.Net release out the door.
> I'm still waiting on one more +1 vote.  The review has been very, VERY slow
> as well as comments.  Only 3 folks actually reviewed the release and gave
> their votes.  What can I do, beside sending reminders like this, to speed
> this up?  Please see email thread below for details.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- George Aroush
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: George Aroush [mailto:george@aroush.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:29 AM
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache
> > Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating
> >
> > Hi Niclas,
> >
> > Thanks for your +1 vote, but most of all for your time.
> >
> > This now gives me:
> >
> > +1 from Erik Hatcher
> > +1 from Niclas Hedhman
> > +0 from Robert Burrell Donkin
> >
> > I still need 1 more +1 to get this release out.  Can at least
> > one other PMC member review this release please?
> >
> > > Personally, I think the project is suffering from a chicken-egg
> > > problem.
> >
> > This is true.  Recently, there has been some interest from
> > folks who want to get on and start contributing.  Lets hope
> > this holds.  The good bit is that there is a good user base
> > community and Lucene.Net is not only recognized but is being
> > used in production out in the field.  An official release,
> > more publicity should help, *AND* we need to start thinking
> > about how ASF can help too should give Lucene.Net a new
> > start.  ASF folks voting on a release, in a timely fashion,
> > is a good start.
> >
> > > I am also pleased to see that the many remarks in the first
> > round has
> > > been attended to promptly.
> > > However, there are 2 more subsystems in "contrib/" and the
> > first file
> > > I checked "Similarity.Net/AssemblyInfo.cs" didn't have the Apache
> > > License header, but others did. I did not
> >
> > "AssemblyInfo.cs" is an auto generated file; we discussed
> > those in first release attempt.
> >
> > > perform an exhaustive check. I would be interested to here how come
> > > "so much" gets added between two reviews of a release 2.0.
> >
> > The only changes between build 4 and build 3, is:
> > 1) Build 4 added the correct copy right header and files
> > 2) Build 4 added 1 new ported project to "contrib",
> > Similarity.Net.  This wasn't ready in time for the first vote
> > but was for the second.
> >
> > > But I think those are minor enough to get my +1 for this release.
> >
> > Much appreciated; thanks.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > -- George
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
HTH, Ted <http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message