incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "George Aroush" <geo...@aroush.net>
Subject RE: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating
Date Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:41:38 GMT
Hi folks,

Please jump in and vote on this release.  It has been well 
over 4 weeks since my original submission.  What will it take 
to get this vote moving?  Is there anything more that I need to do?!

Thanks!
 
-- George Aroush
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Aroush [mailto:george@aroush.net] 
> Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 11:41 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache 
> Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating
> 
> Thanks Erik!
> 
> Folks: Can others jump on this too, review the release and 
> offer their +/-1 vote?  So far I have:
> 
> +1 from Erik Hatcher
> +0 from Robert Burrell Donkin
> 
> Needless to say, this seems to me to be taking longer then I 
> hoped for.  As you know, I need at least 2 +1's to make the 
> release -- so please help and review the release.
> 
> Here are the artifacts again:
> 
> Release history:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/Luc
> ene.Net_2_0_0/
> src/HISTORY.txt
> 
> Release artifact (source & binary):
> http://people.apache.org/~aroush/Lucene.Net-2.0-004/
> 
> I'm asking for your vote to approve this release.
> 
> [ ] +1 Approve the release as Apache Lucene.Net 2.0.0 build 
> 004 incubating
> 
> [ ] -1 Veto this release (explain why so it can be addressed)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- George Aroush
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik@ehatchersolutions.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 10:45 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache 
> Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating
> 
> I've waited out on the vote intentionally to see what others hand.   
> The licensing issues that RAT turned up seem minor to me, 
> especially being in project files that are not part of a 
> binary distribution and probably not even needed for 
> compilation of the codebase in general.
> 
> So...
> 
>     +1 on this release
> 
> Erik
> 
> 
> On Mar 28, 2007, at 9:55 PM, George Aroush wrote:
> 
> > Thanks Robert!  No, you don't have to feel bad about your 
> +0 vote, you 
> > did your part.
> >
> > All: Please review this release and give me your vote so I can move 
> > this release on.  At least, let me know if what Robert 
> found is (the 
> > one file that has old license header) is a release stopper 
> so I can go 
> > back and re-package the release for a new vote.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > -- George Aroush
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 5:22 PM
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache 
> Lucene.Net 
> > 2.0 build 004 incubating
> >
> > On 3/28/07, George Aroush <george@aroush.net> wrote:
> >> Hi Robert,
> >>
> >> Thanks for taking your time and looking at this release.  
> To answer 
> >> your
> >> questions:
> >>
> >> The files *.csproj, and *.sln are the Visual Studio.NET 
> project files
> >> -- those are auto generated and thus I can't edit them outside the 
> >> IDE
> >> -- the same goes to the few *.cs files that you noticed as well as 
> >> the few *.xml and *.html files that you highlighted.
> >
> > yeh
> >
> > IMHO it's pretty naffy that you can't add headers but 
> that's life, i 
> > suppose
> > - or at least m$
> >
> >> For the file,
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/C%23/
> >> contr
> >> ib/Sno wball.Net/Test/Analysis/Snowball/TestSnowball.cs where you 
> >> pointed out the use of the old style Apache License, it looks like 
> >> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-update-scripts
> >> didn't
> >> do the job well here.  This is an original work -- will this issue 
> >> prevent a release?.
> >
> > different people have different opinions :-/
> >
> > (hopefully people will jump in here)
> >
> > IMHO it's a judgment call. i wouldn't cut a release with any header 
> > issues of this kind but i wouldn't -1 one either.
> >
> > RAT is good at catching this kind of issue (though it will 
> pick up a 
> > lot of false negatives  for the XML and HTML files)
> >
> >> Thanks for catching the grammatical error in the 
> README.txt: "An MADN 
> >> ..."
> >> I fixed it in the SVN release.
> >>
> >> Again, thanks for taking your time and looking at this release 
> >> candidate.
> >> Please let me know if I addressed all of your questions 
> and if I get 
> >> your +1 or -1 vote.
> >
> > +0 due to old license
> >
> > (but i feel a little bad about it)
> >
> > - robert
> >
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message