incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "George Aroush" <geo...@aroush.net>
Subject RE: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating
Date Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:56:52 GMT
Hi Folks,

Please help us to get our first official Lucene.Net release out the door.
I'm still waiting on one more +1 vote.  The review has been very, VERY slow
as well as comments.  Only 3 folks actually reviewed the release and gave
their votes.  What can I do, beside sending reminders like this, to speed
this up?  Please see email thread below for details.

Regards,

-- George Aroush


> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Aroush [mailto:george@aroush.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:29 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache 
> Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating
> 
> Hi Niclas,
> 
> Thanks for your +1 vote, but most of all for your time.
> 
> This now gives me:
> 
> +1 from Erik Hatcher
> +1 from Niclas Hedhman
> +0 from Robert Burrell Donkin
> 
> I still need 1 more +1 to get this release out.  Can at least 
> one other PMC member review this release please?
> 
> > Personally, I think the project is suffering from a chicken-egg 
> > problem.
> 
> This is true.  Recently, there has been some interest from 
> folks who want to get on and start contributing.  Lets hope 
> this holds.  The good bit is that there is a good user base 
> community and Lucene.Net is not only recognized but is being 
> used in production out in the field.  An official release, 
> more publicity should help, *AND* we need to start thinking 
> about how ASF can help too should give Lucene.Net a new 
> start.  ASF folks voting on a release, in a timely fashion, 
> is a good start.
> 
> > I am also pleased to see that the many remarks in the first 
> round has 
> > been attended to promptly.
> > However, there are 2 more subsystems in "contrib/" and the 
> first file 
> > I checked "Similarity.Net/AssemblyInfo.cs" didn't have the Apache 
> > License header, but others did. I did not
> 
> "AssemblyInfo.cs" is an auto generated file; we discussed 
> those in first release attempt.
> 
> > perform an exhaustive check. I would be interested to here how come 
> > "so much" gets added between two reviews of a release 2.0.
> 
> The only changes between build 4 and build 3, is:
> 1) Build 4 added the correct copy right header and files
> 2) Build 4 added 1 new ported project to "contrib", 
> Similarity.Net.  This wasn't ready in time for the first vote 
> but was for the second.
> 
> > But I think those are minor enough to get my +1 for this release.
> 
> Much appreciated; thanks.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- George
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message