Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of davanum@gmail.com designates
 64.233.184.227 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=oLTTlAdYp5rg5GlQHboJdQft1Mg6CLFxBXKRIWiHkmX5Xa/OPvYpuPOILrz0HjGiRX3yItONYdIMDDs67JgnuLROAW8rsXf2I2fchb6J3TxWbuGioRvbA8l9llXqF5GMx3fT5P01OS4QaqJUG7UrcEeygbRPrgakt51KkQ+2/oU=
Message-ID: <19e0530f0703150957s72c77678v9d91326873e25ca8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:57:37 -0400
From: "Davanum Srinivas" <davanum@gmail.com>
Reply-To: dims@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Killing the incubator m2 repository
In-Reply-To: <510143ac0703150950o76223f87rb6b4d0a94968c8ec@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <NBBBJGEAGJAKLIDBKJOPCEIPNIAC.noel@devtech.com>
	 <200703151127.37050.daniel.kulp@iona.com>
	 <19e0530f0703150833n3cfe8928xd5516285811fc2be@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200703151200.03582.daniel.kulp@iona.com>
	 <19e0530f0703150911u783d8b77i42c5818fe08c20b2@mail.gmail.com>
	 <510143ac0703150950o76223f87rb6b4d0a94968c8ec@mail.gmail.com>

Jukka,

I asked exactly the same question:
http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg09832.html

And the answer:
http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg09864.html

-- dims

On 3/15/07, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/15/07, Daniel Kulp <daniel.kulp@iona.com> wrote:
> > 5) Having them separate from central really only annoys those who
> > actually want to use the official apache versions.   For my customers, I
> > could easily create a com.dankulp:orb:1.0 pom that just depends on yoko
> > from the incubator repository.  That can be put in central and my
> > customers can depend on that and not even know they are getting the
> > stuff from incubator.    They would still be using the actual apache
> > incubator jars, but they wouldn't have to know about it.
>
> On 3/15/07, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> > #5) I really hope you don't do this :)
>
> If I'm writing (outside the ASF) an application or a library that
> depends on a release artifact from an incubating Apache project, then
> I would be doing exactly that. If I'm happy with the artifact as a
> dependency, then why should I need to make my downstream users
> explicitly care about Apache's internal policies regarding incubating
> projects?
>
> Do we have some stated policy that if an external project depends on
> incubating releases, then they need to make their downstream users
> explicitly aware of that? IMHO the only requirements we place on
> external uses should be those of the ASLv2.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org