incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Raymond Feng" <enjoyj...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: EJB code dump, was: svn commit: r511225 [1/4]
Date Mon, 26 Feb 2007 06:13:14 GMT
Hi,

To strictly follow the process, I have removed the code from my sandbox too.

Thanks,
Raymond

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeremy Boynes" <jboynes@apache.org>
To: <general@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: EJB code dump, was: svn commit: r511225 [1/4]


> Thanks Raymond.
>
> Strictly the code should not be in SVN until it has been cleared  legally 
> and part of that would be to deal with issues like the  copyright here:
>   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/rfeng/ 
> ejb/binding/pom.xml
>
> First step of the legal side is to have receipt acknowledged by an 
> authorized member of the ASF which could be any of our mentors or the 
> IPMC Chair. This ack would be reflected in the ip-clearance page.  Then we 
> can vote to accept the contribution (lazy consensus by the  IPMC being 
> enough but they do need to be notified).
>
> There are more details on the process here:
>   http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
>
> I have questions about what we are going to do with this but I'll  leave 
> those for your other thread.
> --
> Jeremy
>
> On Feb 25, 2007, at 10:17 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry for the confusion as I'm new to this situation. I meant to  get the 
>> code into SVN as a base for discussion. I chose the  paticular branch 
>> simply because I only need minor effort to get the  code built.
>>
>> I moved the code to my sandbox for now (http://svn.apache.org/repos/ 
>> asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/rfeng/ejb) and removed it from the  branch.
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=511566
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=511567
>>
>> I'll start another thread to discuss if and/or how we can accept  the 
>> contribution.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "ant elder" <ant.elder@gmail.com>
>> To: <general@incubator.apache.org>
>> Cc: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 5:39 AM
>> Subject: Re: EJB code dump, was: svn commit: r511225 [1/4]
>>
>>
>>> On 2/25/07, Jeremy Boynes <jboynes@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:26 PM, rfeng@apache.org wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Author: rfeng
>>>> > Date: Fri Feb 23 22:26:55 2007
>>>> > New Revision: 511225
>>>> >
>>>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=511225
>>>> > Log:
>>>> > [sca-integration-branch] Add EJB reference binding (TUSCANY-1126)
>>>>
>>>> -1
>>>>
>>>> There has been no discussion at all about this contribution in the
>>>> community. We've had someone from a vendor attach code in JIRA, a  co-
>>>> worker say they would review and "possibly check it into a sandbox"
>>>> and then this commit to a branch only the vendor's employees are
>>>> working on. Not one single mail to the dev list. This isn't  community
>>>> development, it's a code dump.
>>>>
>>>> Please take this out of SVN and talk to the community about it - you
>>>> might find people are interested in it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Could one of our mentors/IPMCers comment on if this -1 comes with 
>>> enough of
>>> a technical reason to make it a veto? If thats the case you need  to 
>>> revert
>>> the commit now before anymore discussion Raymond.
>>>
>>> Hopefully there will be discussion and development of the ejb  binding 
>>> on the
>>> ML in future, but the way its been done I don't think warrants it  being
>>> removed right now. As I understand it there has been a CCLA  received by
>>> Apache for the code. In the past there's been a lot of similar sized
>>> function committed to Tuscany trunk with no discussion until 
>>> afterwards, and
>>> this code didn't get put in the trunk. More discussion would be  better 
>>> but I
>>> think one reason people do it this way may be as its easier to  talk 
>>> about
>>> things once there is actual code in SVN to refer to and try out.  The 
>>> commit
>>> was done late on Friday probably they're off for the weekend now,  so 
>>> how
>>> about waiting to see if they start discussions about this  contribution 
>>> on
>>> Monday.
>>>
>>>   ...ant
>>>
>>> PS, Rashmi, this looks really good to me and nicely written, i  think it
>>> would be a great addition to Tuscany. Hope you don't get put off  by 
>>> this
>>> procedural debate and and can stick around to help develop Tuscany 
>>> further.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message