Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98137 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2006 10:41:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Dec 2006 10:41:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 90057 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2006 10:41:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89870 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2006 10:41:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89859 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2006 10:41:53 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 02:41:53 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.210.96.236] (HELO byaroza.objectstyle.org) (207.210.96.236) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 02:41:42 -0800 Received: (qmail 21559 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2006 10:41:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?7??????????p????IPv6:::1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Dec 2006 10:41:20 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <4577482F.6090305@bristowhill.com> References: <3F81E767-B20F-471A-8428-58496DADF941@objectstyle.org> <4577482F.6090305@bristowhill.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Andrus Adamchik Subject: TLP Resolution Template Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 12:41:19 +0200 To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Dec 7, 2006, at 12:46 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote: >> There was a question raised by Greg Stein about a better template for >> board resolution, but since no alternative template has been made >> available, we are sticking with what we have. > > I suggest you change all "Apache Cayenne PMC" references to "Apache > Cayenne Project" in that resolution (and maybe it will help the next > podling). Well, I didn't want to make a change during the vote as this is not as simple as search and replace. It looks like this is something that will require more consideration going forward. In fact the way it is worded, most references to the PMC are correct. E.g. "members of the PMC" or "Apache Cayenne PMC [..] is tasked with the migration [...] of the incubating Apache Cayenne project". Actually I think the only place where the change might make sense is in the second paragraph that now states something like: "NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Cayenne PMC", be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation". But even here, instead of replacing PMC with Project, I think we simply need to add a sentence about establishing a project (as PMC also has be established). Comments? Andrus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org