Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <7b774c950612100701ne21d8c7kc2514dd41b904076@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:01:00 +0100
From: "Dan Diephouse" <dan@envoisolutions.com>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Incubating Release
In-Reply-To: <88f5d710612100216o4af6f61as9c7838ffed32eb05@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_73913_27927318.1165762860361"
References: <7b774c950611290850l1dd4c80aj4744539876af75c7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5c902b9e0612091909p34aaa0b2q90a455b78035d3f0@mail.gmail.com>
	 <7b774c950612100019l58a7c7afme94eba9bf8153e00@mail.gmail.com>
	 <88f5d710612100216o4af6f61as9c7838ffed32eb05@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_73913_27927318.1165762860361
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

We use the one published by Sun under the CDDL I believe.

- Dan

On 12/10/06, Paul Fremantle <pzfreo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dan
>
> So you don't currently include any of the JAXWS API JARs?
>
> Paul
>
> On 12/10/06, Dan Diephouse <dan@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > I believe if you look closer, you'll find that under the "goals"
> section. In
> > the introduction we even talk about it like "Apache Incubator CXF will
> also
> > support several models like JAX-WS." We aren't claiming anywhere that I
> can
> > see that we've implemented JAX-WS. Just saying that we'd like to do so
> in
> > very clear terms.
> >
> > - Dan
> >
> > On 12/10/06, Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 11/29/06, Dan Diephouse <dan@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > > > The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes
> the
> > > > previous licensing issues. Builds have been published here:
> > >
> > > I was taking a quick look at CXF's site and I noticed the reference to
> > > a JSR spec.
> > >
> > > Has CXF passed the TCK for JSR-181 (JAX-WS)?  If so, then cool.  If
> > > not, then, AFAIK, we're forbidden from releasing any implementation of
> > > a JSR that does not pass all of the relevant TCKs.  (Thank the JSPA on
> > > that one.)  So, I'd suggest confirming with Geir that you're in okay
> > > legal waters before cutting a CXF release.
> > >
> > > Thanks!  -- justin
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dan Diephouse
> > Envoi Solutions
> > http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Paul Fremantle
> VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>
> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
> paul@wso2.com
>
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

------=_Part_73913_27927318.1165762860361--