Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73482 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2006 23:01:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Dec 2006 23:01:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 48284 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2006 23:01:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 48116 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2006 23:01:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 48098 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2006 23:01:03 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:01:03 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.233.184.232] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.232) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:00:50 -0800 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i32so390892wra for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:00:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.117.15 with SMTP id p15mr3337134agc.1165532428700; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:00:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.63.17 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:00:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7b774c950612071500j5e95562axf3e68f27bd04afe3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 18:00:28 -0500 From: "Dan Diephouse" To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Deploying Incubator Maven Artifacts [was Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)] Cc: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org, "robert burrell donkin" , abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_46585_27757948.1165532428676" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_46585_27757948.1165532428676 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 12/7/06, Daniel Kulp wrote: > I would say for now we just remove that jar if it's needed. However, how > did > the servicemix and other projects votes pass if it's a requirement? Is > this > another "new requirement in the middle of a vote" thing? > > *wonders the same thing* Additionally, I just realized there are some projects too that have been publishing Maven builds that haven't been approved. Most recently Abdera did this [1][2]. They voted for the release of their binaries, but not their maven artifacts which they created/deployed post vote as I understand it (sorry to cause trouble Abdera folks, I was the one pushing for those builds too!). - Dan 1. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200612.mbox/%3c45749D47.1010109@gmail.com%3e 2. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-abdera-dev/200612.mbox/%3cb20ce4ed0612051532m33f1a5bfu66f25e72d3e50a7@mail.gmail.com%3e -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog ------=_Part_46585_27757948.1165532428676--