Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <c5e632550612110227k3997b153n9820b3e21ef9fe07@mail.gmail.com>
References: <45778E96.8050200@redhat.com>
 <9603C153-BBA0-407E-8084-BCFB457A2D2F@apache.org>
 <c5e632550612110227k3997b153n9820b3e21ef9fe07@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <439C9201-B6C0-40EA-8569-4604879A9426@apache.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Brian McCallister <brianm@apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid M1
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:15:07 -0800
To: general@incubator.apache.org


On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:27 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:

> On 12/6/06, Brian McCallister <brianm@apache.org> wrote:
>> Concern:
>> Was there any resolution on the AMQP licensing terms (1) in relation
>> to making releases? I think it is okay, but how it fits into the
>> current draft guidelines (2) I am unsure. I think Cliff voted for
>> this, so I suspect it is okay. Just want to make sure :-)
>
> Yes, before I gave my +1 I made sure the AMQP spec license allowed for
> distribution (which got corrected from the earlier version of the
> license).  I also personally did a review to ensure that all
> third-party licenses are acceptable (mainly BSD-like, Apache, CPL, and
> MPL) and that the required notices for these components are covered by
> the NOTICE file.

Thanks!

+1 from me, things look in order.

-Brian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org