incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Incubating Release
Date Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:22:48 GMT

On Dec 1, 2006, at 10:10 AM, Martin Ritchie wrote:

> On 01/12/06, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 30, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > What Jim pointed out was docs/release_notes.txt -- it should  
>> probably
>> > include the incubator disclaimer.
>> >
>>
>> Yes. There is nothing in that file to indicate incubation.
>> It's an important doc, so the fact of incubation
>> should be clear.
>
>
>> From (http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html):
> Disclaimers
> Podling web sites MUST include a clear disclaimer on their website and
> in all documentation (including releases) stating that they are in
> incubation. Podlings SHOULD use the following text for all
> disclaimers:
> ---
>
> So are we saying that having a DISCLAIMER file and the disclaimer in
> the README at the top level is not "clear" enough or does "all
> documentation" need to have the disclaimer as in all documentation
> files?
>
> Would be good to clear this up and update the Disclaimer section to
> say exactly where the specified disclaimer text should be put.
>

This is the RELEASE NOTES for God's sake! Do you really
think that a document that details the release notes
for a codebase should not specify that the codebase
is in Incubation.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message