incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dan Diephouse" <...@envoisolutions.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Incubating Release
Date Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:05:18 GMT
Changed to say:

"In progress. Work is ongoing to ensure we pass the TCKs."

We do not have the JAX-WS TCK yet. We petitioned Beir for it a while back,
but have not received it from Sun yet.

- Dan

On 12/10/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> DanD, DanK,
>
> I guess this page is wrong as well [1]. Let's not perpetuate the total
> myth that cxf implements both JSR 181 and JAXWS 2.0.
>
> " JAX-WS/JSR-181 Annotation Support      Completed"
>
> Clearly CXF has not passed the TCK's for either one. Please consider
> writing a strong disclaimer that you *DON'T* comply with these
> standards. From what i understand the beehive team split out support
> for WSM and did not ship it with the actual beehive releases because
> we don't have access to JSR 181 TCK. Am quite sure we (Apache) don't
> have JAX-WS TCK yet because i am waiting for it to put Axis2' JAXWS
> through its paces :)
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/xfire-migration-guide.html
>
> On 12/10/06, Dan Diephouse <dan@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > I believe if you look closer, you'll find that under the "goals"
> section. In
> > the introduction we even talk about it like "Apache Incubator CXF will
> also
> > support several models like JAX-WS." We aren't claiming anywhere that I
> can
> > see that we've implemented JAX-WS. Just saying that we'd like to do so
> in
> > very clear terms.
> >
> > - Dan
> >
> > On 12/10/06, Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 11/29/06, Dan Diephouse <dan@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > > > The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes
> the
> > > > previous licensing issues. Builds have been published here:
> > >
> > > I was taking a quick look at CXF's site and I noticed the reference to
> > > a JSR spec.
> > >
> > > Has CXF passed the TCK for JSR-181 (JAX-WS)?  If so, then cool.  If
> > > not, then, AFAIK, we're forbidden from releasing any implementation of
> > > a JSR that does not pass all of the relevant TCKs.  (Thank the JSPA on
> > > that one.)  So, I'd suggest confirming with Geir that you're in okay
> > > legal waters before cutting a CXF release.
> > >
> > > Thanks!  -- justin
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dan Diephouse
> > Envoi Solutions
> > http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message