incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <daniel.k...@iona.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Incubating Release
Date Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:26:02 GMT
On Friday 01 December 2006 10:10, Martin Ritchie wrote:
> On 01/12/06, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 30, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> > > What Jim pointed out was docs/release_notes.txt -- it should probably
> > > include the incubator disclaimer.
> >
> > Yes. There is nothing in that file to indicate incubation.
> > It's an important doc, so the fact of incubation
> > should be clear.
>
> From (http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html):
> Disclaimers
> Podling web sites MUST include a clear disclaimer on their website and
> in all documentation (including releases) stating that they are in
> incubation. Podlings SHOULD use the following text for all
> disclaimers:
> ---
>
> So are we saying that having a DISCLAIMER file and the disclaimer in
> the README at the top level is not "clear" enough or does "all
> documentation" need to have the disclaimer as in all documentation
> files?
>
> Would be good to clear this up and update the Disclaimer section to
> say exactly where the specified disclaimer text should be put.
>
> Cheers

What about things like JavaDoc?   Do we need to make sure incubator is 
splashed all over the generated javadocs?

We definitely need a concrete list of places where we need to add the 
disclaimer.


-- 
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message