incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Davanum Srinivas" <dava...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Incubating Release
Date Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:23:08 GMT
Much better. thanks.

-- dims

On 12/10/06, Dan Diephouse <dan@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> Changed to say:
>
> "In progress. Work is ongoing to ensure we pass the TCKs."
>
> We do not have the JAX-WS TCK yet. We petitioned Beir for it a while back,
> but have not received it from Sun yet.
>
> - Dan
>
>
> On 12/10/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> > DanD, DanK,
> >
> > I guess this page is wrong as well [1]. Let's not perpetuate the total
> > myth that cxf implements both JSR 181 and JAXWS 2.0.
> >
> > " JAX-WS/JSR-181 Annotation Support      Completed"
> >
> > Clearly CXF has not passed the TCK's for either one. Please consider
> > writing a strong disclaimer that you *DON'T* comply with these
> > standards. From what i understand the beehive team split out support
> > for WSM and did not ship it with the actual beehive releases because
> > we don't have access to JSR 181 TCK. Am quite sure we (Apache) don't
> > have JAX-WS TCK yet because i am waiting for it to put Axis2' JAXWS
> > through its paces :)
> >
> > thanks,
> > dims
> >
> > [1]
> http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/xfire-migration-guide.html
> >
> > On 12/10/06, Dan Diephouse <dan@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > > I believe if you look closer, you'll find that under the "goals"
> section. In
> > > the introduction we even talk about it like "Apache Incubator CXF will
> also
> > > support several models like JAX-WS." We aren't claiming anywhere that I
> can
> > > see that we've implemented JAX-WS. Just saying that we'd like to do so
> in
> > > very clear terms.
> > >
> > > - Dan
> > >
> > > On 12/10/06, Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 11/29/06, Dan Diephouse < dan@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > > > > The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes
> the
> > > > > previous licensing issues. Builds have been published here:
> > > >
> > > > I was taking a quick look at CXF's site and I noticed the reference to
> > > > a JSR spec.
> > > >
> > > > Has CXF passed the TCK for JSR-181 (JAX-WS)?  If so, then cool.  If
> > > > not, then, AFAIK, we're forbidden from releasing any implementation of
> > > > a JSR that does not pass all of the relevant TCKs.  (Thank the JSPA on
> > > > that one.)  So, I'd suggest confirming with Geir that you're in okay
> > > > legal waters before cutting a CXF release.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!  -- justin
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Dan Diephouse
> > > Envoi Solutions
> > > http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> Envoi Solutions
> http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog


-- 
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message