Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of davanum@gmail.com designates
 66.249.82.236 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=YrOehFVd3Gt/+wgzH9RLGqgvX9KftHNU31XAUMvNI2XzS17dvVZa33hnmASIM5bCuy8UKo6llg1jIOrI5y4pQwvW14gr9HO8FSx49lgEAHbouBHfzldt5z0z4kRKomrb60aJD9YJi96fLfLIE+c9G0f5xCH6oBYewCpjgrZncNU=
Message-ID: <19e0530f0611240504j21d53443hc43262301500ad3e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:04:48 -0500
From: "Davanum Srinivas" <davanum@gmail.com>
Reply-To: dims@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release
In-Reply-To: <f470f68e0611240501o14e20790pec5e81280c8e6465@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <7b774c950611212012j47e4882at4a04757a1f4fc79a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f470f68e0611231319q1ab7a1fbvf34f6d7a1594fa83@mail.gmail.com>
	 <7b774c950611231610id290c9bl83841c8a0d7099ef@mail.gmail.com>
	 <7b774c950611231739x80df942w39179f7d22d28bff@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f470f68e0611240501o14e20790pec5e81280c8e6465@mail.gmail.com>

Robert,

Users can download that xsd and use it themselves. We don't have to
ship it in the box:)

-- dims

On 11/24/06, robert burrell donkin <robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/24/06, Dan Diephouse <dan@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > I've taken immediate action to remove these files from SVN.
>
> thanks :-)
>
> > I'm curious to
> > know if any other Apache projects depend on this wsi-swa.xsd file as I don't
> > think its possible to use the JAXB 2.0 soap with attachments support without
> > referencing this file. I know the JAXWS-RI itself redistributes it, which
> > may have thrown us off.
>
> yeh - that's understandable
>
> far too often, web standards are a real PITA legally speaking
>
> > Are there any WS-I experts around that can shed light on this?
>
> or (alternatively) ws standards process experts
>
> dims? sanjiva?
>
> > It is hard to
> > conform to the basic profile if you can't use their schemas in
> > projects/products - which kind of defeats the point.
>
> +1
>
> this point needs to make frequently and strongly to standards
> organisations. it may be worth trying to open a dialog (again?)
>
> may need to do a clean room implementation (if that's allowed by the
> specification)
>
> > I will start a thread sometime soon on legal-discuss on how to best deal
> > with this.
>
> +1
>
> - robert
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org