incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "kelvin goodson" <kelvingood...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] - Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts
Date Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:44:36 GMT
Bill,

   thanks for your comments.  I have made fixes in the trunk for the license
file suggestions you raise where I am certain of the required changes (
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=470007)
and I have raised a JIRA (
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-894) to make certain of
my new understanding that the CPL is no longer required
in our LICENSE file.

There is documentation in the binary distribution in the javadoc folder,
which is pointed to from the readme.html file.
There is documentation in the samples distribution in the site/apidocs
folder (not my choice of layout,  its what maven defines as the standard
location and I haven't been able to work out how to configure that)
There are instructions in the source distribution on how to build the
javadoc that is found in the binary and samples distributions.

Best Regards, Kelvin.


On 27/10/06, Bill Dudney <bdudney@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Kelvin,
>
> The release includes the license and notice files but I don't see any
> file pointing out the licenses of the individual jar files included
> in the release.
>
> The notice file is some what ambiguous on what is included under
> which license. It refers to the EPL and CPL (both are fine AFAIKT
> from [1]). But it seems like the notices of which jar is licensed
> under which license should be more explicit [2].
>
> Since none of the license stuff is board approved yet its not binding
> (AFAIK) so take that for what its worth.
>
> One other thing is the lack of docs, I could not find any.
>
> TTFN,
>
> -bd-
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html
> [2] http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html#labeling
>
> On Oct 25, 2006, at 11:09 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
>
> > The Tuscany PPMC has voted to release the SDO for Java API
> > implementation as
> > part of the M2 release.
> > In accordance with Incubator release procedures we are asking the
> > Incubator
> > PMC to
> > approve this release.
> >
> > Vote thread:*
> > *http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg09797.html
> > Result thread:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg10046.html
> >
> > Regards, Kelvin Goodson.
> > **
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message