incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Luciano Resende" <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release DAS for Java M2 artifacts
Date Tue, 07 Nov 2006 05:25:16 GMT
One more thing, about the signatures,the public key for verifying the
signatures may be found in :
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS

- Luciano Resende

On 11/6/06, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Robert for looking into this, more comments inline...
> Please let me know if you have any further questions.
>
> On 11/6/06, robert burrell donkin <robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com > wrote:
> >
> > On 11/5/06, Luciano Resende < luckbr1975@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The Tuscany PPMC has voted to Release DAS for Java API Implementation
> > as
> > > part of the M2 release.
> > > In accordance with Incubator release procedures we are asking the
> > Incubator
> > > PMC to  approve this release.
> >
> > +0 (a couple of questions which i'd like answering before i can +1)
> >
> > please fix:
> > ------------
> >
> > md5 sums are not in the correct format. please delete all but the last
> > line. (AIUI they are read automatically by some scripts.) this does
> > not require a rebuild.
>
>
> The files should be in the right format now.
>
> questions
> > ------------
> >
> > sample-companyweb-1.0-incubator-M2.war lacks LICENSE and NOTICE files.
> > this means that it cannot be distributed as a raw artifact. is the
> > intention to ban this artifact from distribution via maven?
>
>
> LICENSE and NOTICE are available inside the war file at
> WEB-INF\classes\META-INF, please let me know if they are in the wrong place.
>
>
> RAT: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/das/1.0-incubator-M2/samples/testing/tomcat/datasource.xsl
> >
> > lacks a license header. is there a reason (for example, is it
> > generated) or is it just an oversight?
>
>
> This was an oversight on my part, I have created a JIRA and a patch was
> applied to the trunk.
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-900
>
> Would this be enough ?
>
>
> important (but can be fixed for next release)
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> >
> > key ID 96324791 used to sign releases is not available from the usual
> > public key server networks. please upload to pgp.mit.edu (web
> > interface) or use gpg (to upload to any well known pubilc keyserver).
>
>
> Sure, the key is from kgoodson, that was of great help signing and
> uploading the DAS artifacts. I have forwarded this comment to him.
>
> stylistic (best practice)
> > ---------------------------
> >
> > release names can be a form of advertising and can also allow the
> > trademark to be used to prevent unauthorised jars being distributed
> > with similar names. so, i'd recommend ensuing all releases are
> > prefixed with 'apache-tuscany' when tuscany graduates. i have no
> > objection to using this naming in the incubator (though some people
> > may).
> >
> > the compressed archives unpack into the current directory. this is a
> > real PITA for most users and a bad practice. there are two good
> > approaches: either structure the release so that all  duistributions
> > unpack into the same directory (with name based on the release) in a
> > way that elegantly combines or have each unpack distribution into a
> > separate, meaningfully but uniquely named directory.
>
>
>
> I'm aware of this, and have submitted a patch to fix this in the trunk,
> but unfortunately it is not available in this release. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-886
>
>
> - robert
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message