incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: [VOTE WITHDRAWN] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release
Date Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:02:58 GMT
Sorry, I just don't like that changes to the bits based on an  
internal review should change the name of the release.

Craig

On Nov 21, 2006, at 2:51 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:

> To avoid those issue ActiveMQ tends to do a build of say ActiveMQ
> 4.1.0 and we drop it in
> a directory called ActiveMQ-4.1.0-RC1 and then if during the vote
> something happens, we rebuild and 4.1.0 again and put it in directory
> called RC2 etc.
>
> So I would guess you guys just need to put out at  0.9.6-incubating  
> RC2
>
> On 11/21/06, Patrick Linskey <plinskey@bea.com> wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I agree with Marc that we should continue to iterate on the
>> > > 0.9.6-incubating release until we get it right. It would only be
>> > > confusing if we actually publish the incubating release and
>> > then publish
>> > > another 0.9.6. But iterations on the release candidate
>> > aren't new releases.
>> >
>> > Yes, but it is confusing if you look at the thread about voting on
>> > 0.9.6. If 0.9.7 isn't available. Can we have 0.9.6.1 as the next
>> > iteration of the 0.9.6 release?
>>
>> I don't understand the confusion... 0.9.6 hasn't been released yet;
>> nobody should be confused by a vote for it.
>>
>> Personally, I don't much care what we do at this point, although I'd
>> prefer a 0.9.7 to 0.9.6.1, since there is no 0.9.6 currently and  
>> 0.9.6.1
>> implies that one does.
>>
>> However, I *would* like clear guidance about what to do. Is this  
>> going
>> to cause problems with incubator approval of the 0.9.6 vote that's
>> currently running on the OpenJPA mailing list?
>>
>> -Patrick
>> _____________________________________________________________________ 
>> __
>> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may  
>> contain
>> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and   
>> affiliated
>> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted   
>> and/or
>> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the  
>> individual
>> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended  
>> recipient,
>> and have received this message in error, please immediately return  
>> this
>> by email and then delete it.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message