incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Davanum Srinivas" <dava...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release
Date Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:05:17 GMT
FWIW, typically we end up using ant's <get> tag to get such files...

-- dims

On 11/24/06, Dan Diephouse <dan@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> Well, we'd like to have it as part of our build as it seems necessary to
> test JAXB 2 + soap with attachments*. We've included it as a URL instead of
> a local file now, but that breaks offline builds - which we've worked hard
> to avoid so far.
>
> Regards,
>
> - Dan
>
> * I'm going to confirm that though. It'll be interesting to see what the TCK
> includes.... :-)
>
> On 11/24/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Robert,
> >
> > Users can download that xsd and use it themselves. We don't have to
> > ship it in the box:)
> >
> > -- dims
> >
> > On 11/24/06, robert burrell donkin <robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > On 11/24/06, Dan Diephouse <dan@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
> > > > I've taken immediate action to remove these files from SVN.
> > >
> > > thanks :-)
> > >
> > > > I'm curious to
> > > > know if any other Apache projects depend on this wsi-swa.xsd file as I
> don't
> > > > think its possible to use the JAXB 2.0 soap with attachments support
> without
> > > > referencing this file. I know the JAXWS-RI itself redistributes it,
> which
> > > > may have thrown us off.
> > >
> > > yeh - that's understandable
> > >
> > > far too often, web standards are a real PITA legally speaking
> > >
> > > > Are there any WS-I experts around that can shed light on this?
> > >
> > > or (alternatively) ws standards process experts
> > >
> > > dims? sanjiva?
> > >
> > > > It is hard to
> > > > conform to the basic profile if you can't use their schemas in
> > > > projects/products - which kind of defeats the point.
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > this point needs to make frequently and strongly to standards
> > > organisations. it may be worth trying to open a dialog (again?)
> > >
> > > may need to do a clean room implementation (if that's allowed by the
> > > specification)
> > >
> > > > I will start a thread sometime soon on legal-discuss on how to best
> deal
> > > > with this.
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > - robert
> > >
> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> Envoi Solutions
> http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog


-- 
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message