From general-return-11171-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Sun Oct 01 17:53:02 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98159 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2006 17:53:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2006 17:53:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 73290 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2006 17:52:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 73174 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2006 17:52:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 73163 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2006 17:52:57 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 10:52:57 -0700 Authentication-Results: idunn.apache.osuosl.org header.from=robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com; domainkeys=good X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE DomainKey-Status: good X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 Received: from [66.249.92.174] ([66.249.92.174:37638] helo=ug-out-1314.google.com) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1.1.8 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 63/31-05102-77000254 for ; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 10:52:56 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id y2so536122uge for ; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 10:52:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PG/u9qULstRQgkn/AcFZi5Db7GckzZLExh+6DMIdc7HJoxgVIm1/2TbqVNIm6XWh+pfxcc5CB8pZ5yejTH8GwdRfYF4Z28m/mfoVv2FTDXTj9NFC7F1WE02IUqRzwCMLwFIplptq8Pe97gK6Ti17em5+GYXwFI9BAWP26SyK374= Received: by 10.67.97.18 with SMTP id z18mr2108605ugl; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 10:52:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.20.7 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Oct 2006 10:52:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 18:52:53 +0100 From: "robert burrell donkin" To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Problem with commit rights on Celtixfire In-Reply-To: <5c902b9e0610011040w51b6338fi3123fb3b6df0cd08@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061001172142.GA16105@cr> <31cc37360610011026h72982e58obcd91048f2086091@mail.gmail.com> <5c902b9e0610011040w51b6338fi3123fb3b6df0cd08@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 10/1/06, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On 10/1/06, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > > +1 provided we take the list of interested committers out of the > > proposal. We shouldn't be indicating that we are in favour of a > > proposal if we're not going to make the committers listed committers. > > > This works for some proposals but not for others. Take Wicket for example: > we would require all of the people who already had commit access to Wicket > re-prove themselves? That's incredibly dismissive of their past > contributions. delegation to the PPMC means that the Mentors have it within their power to solve this one themselves. IMHO it would be right (in the case of a project like Wicket) for the Mentors to elect all those who had commit access already as committers right away. i would also see nothing wrong in moving quickly to drafting all existing Wicket committers onto the PPMC. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org