From general-return-11280-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Oct 03 18:54:43 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13175 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2006 18:54:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2006 18:54:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 11973 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 18:54:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 11821 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 18:54:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 11810 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2006 18:54:37 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:54:37 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= Received: from [66.112.202.2] ([66.112.202.2:42709] helo=mail.devtech.com) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1.1.8 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 72/98-08153-7E1B2254 for ; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:54:31 -0700 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.devtech.com (JAMES SMTP Server 2.3.0rc3) with SMTP ID 1023; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 14:54:28 -0400 (EDT) From: "Noel J. Bergman" To: "Chris Gray" , Cc: Subject: RE: Wonka, Mika, and Apache Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 14:54:22 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 In-Reply-To: <200609271109.15536.chris.gray@kiffer.be> Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sounds interesting. Does this still include the hardware portability layer? Any synergies with APR? Does it include the AWT code? --- Noel -----Original Message----- From: Chris Gray [mailto:chris.gray@kiffer.be] Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 5:09 To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Wonka, Mika, and Apache Hello guys, To introduce myself: I'm one of the original developers of the Wonka embedded VM, and my company sells both support for Wonka and our own derivative which we call Mika. Recently we made Mika available under the same BSD-style licence as Wonka. My question is whether Apache would be interested in adopting Wonka/Mika as a project, either within Harmony or as an embedded counterpart thereto. Currently ownership of the code is divided between Punch Telematix, who acquired the assets of my former employer Acunia, and my own company. Punch have no interest in the VM beyond the fact that it is an essential component of a product (the CarCube) which they inherited from Acunia. I believe they would have no objection to granting rights to the AF, beyond the sheer effort of doing so. They can probably be persuaded, but first I'd like to know if there is sufficient interest within the AF. Best regards, Chris -- Chris Gray /k/ Embedded Java Solutions BE0503765045 Embedded & Mobile Java, OSGi http://www.k-embedded-java.com/ chris.gray@kiffer.be +32 3 216 0369 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org