incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "robert burrell donkin" <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne
Date Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:56:39 GMT
On 10/1/06, Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>
> On Oct 1, 2006, at 2:42 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> > for example http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cayenne/main/
> > tags/2.0.1/cayenne/tutorials/quick-start/cayenne-tutorial/src/
> > cayenne/tutorial/Artist.java
> > looked to me like an example of a hand-crafted subclass.
>
> This one was generated, but then customized by hand. We do need a
> license on it - I will clean this up.

there are a few other similar ones in those directories which might
also need the same treatment

> > preferences files didn't look like it was generated to me either:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cayenne/main/tags/2.0.1/
> > cayenne/cayenne-java/src/modeler/resources/pref/
> > ModelerPreferences.map.xml.
> > though perhaps i was fooled...
>
> This one is generated by the Modeler tool to map preferences database
> for itself.

yes: makes sense now

> > one good practice often adopted by projects which make extensive use
> > of generated source is to ensure that it's clear (either by including
> > notes in the documents or by creating them in directories with clear
> > names) which documents are generated and which are not. it would make
> > it a lot easier and quicker to audit cayenne releases if this practice
> > were adopted.
>
> Good point - I am +1. In the future releases we'll need to make our
> templates more explicit in this respect.

thanks

- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message