incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Noel J. Bergman" <n...@devtech.com>
Subject RE: PPMCs [was Re: what are required for contributing to release management]
Date Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:08:00 GMT
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman <noel@devtech.com> wrote:
> > > > I am pretty philosophically against making every committer PPMC
> > > > > members.
> > > I don't agree at all.  If they contribute code, they merit a say in
the
> > > direction of the project.
> > Are you reading Dan's statement as independent or dependent upon time?
I
> > read it as an objection to mandated concurrency.  Over time, your view
> > should be the dominant one, as each Committer becomes a (P)PMC member.
> as for the one line that you retained: I view Dan's perspective as
> being independent of time - that is, committers should never equal
> the PMC - I view that as extremely unhealthy.

If I had read it as you do, I would agree with you.  I read it as suggestive
of a process over time, and that at any snapshot in time, the body of
Committers might not be entirely present in the PPMC.

	--- Noel



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message