incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Luciano Resende" <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] - Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts
Date Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:37:28 GMT
Just trying to help, the SDO tag is available here :


https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.0-incubator-M2/

- Luciano Resende

On 10/28/06, robert burrell donkin <robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/25/06, kelvin goodson <kelvingoodson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The Tuscany PPMC has voted to release the SDO for Java API
> implementation as
> > part of the M2 release.
> > In accordance with Incubator release procedures we are asking the
> Incubator
> > PMC to
> > approve this release.
>
> reviewing http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5a/
> (since the email doesn't include the explicit reference)
>
> major
> -------
>
> no major issues
>
> there are a few minor questions that need clearing up in 'important'
> below. i'd be happy to see these issues resolved in the source without
> recutting the release provided that the provinance of these files is
> ok. (running RAT will give exact filenames.)
>
> important
> -----------
> i can't find a tag in subversion. please take a tag next time (or
> explain your tag naming system if i've missed it).
>
> the files in
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/sample/src/main/resources/
> appear to be missing license headers. please conform that this is
> either an oversight or that they are generated.
>
> the status file is worrying: there are two CCLAs pending. please
> confirm that this is either an oversight or that these CCLAs are not
> pertinent to this material.
>
> MANIFESTs are missing Implementation-Vendor-Id (yes, i know it's a
> PITA and the various jarspecifications are a mess). best to add it if
> you can do so without too much pain.
>
> files in
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/impl/model/
> are missing license headers. please confirm that this was an oversight
> or provide a reason why they don't need them.
>
> a few files in
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/impl/src/test/resources/
> are missing license headers. please confirm that this was an oversight
> or provide a reason why they don't need them.
>
> stylistic
> --------
>
> the download directories are a bit of a hotch-potch. the binary
> unpacks to the current directory, sample unpacks to samples, sdo impl
> unpacks to sdo, sdo api to sdo-api. it's best to have a naming plan
> and stick to it. releases which unpack to the current directory
> irritate me (and many other users). i prefer the unpack to directories
> named after the release (this makes it easier to manage multiple
> releases of the same product).
>
> - robert
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message