incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Diephouse <...@envoisolutions.com>
Subject Re: Policy on Initial Committership
Date Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:51:16 GMT
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

> On 10/1/06, Noel J. Bergman <noel@devtech.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I disagree.  You're conflating process with application of process, and
>> then
>> stating as assured a case when your fellow PMC Members would act in a
>> manner
>> you find offensive.
>>
>> Why would the PMC not elect "the people who contributed it further
>> access"?
>
>
>
> We've seen an example of this with Celtixfire.  So far, we're waiting 
> for an
> explanation (as those discussions did not occur in a place where the
> Incubator PMC could provide any oversight), but the aggrieved parties
> believe they have been barred access to a project they felt they 
> contributed
> to.
>
> So, I don't believe this situation isn't a hypothetical at all.  -- 
> justin
>
It seems to me that this is the reverse actually - committers were 
approved, and then the PMC revoked their rights. However, this is just 
inference on my part so far.

- Dan

-- 
Dan Diephouse
(616) 971-2053
Envoi Solutions LLC
http://netzooid.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message