Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54609 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2006 07:57:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2006 07:57:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 21288 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2006 07:57:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 20830 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2006 07:57:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 20819 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2006 07:57:33 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:57:33 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of brett.porter@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.189] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:57:32 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a25so144333nfc for ; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:57:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pIs+pi7Y0KqhSnlrv5ZRR+yj/P34YPAplaapzR2bUdssEpOxof/W6dWHTmcDQ06m4wNk4ehCeLN0hF+xcfc4DYTjt5ShplZAJq133uM5OZQUFKwAgs82vqvSdAMoJz+Ekm8WW+qhSUg5JyruKVT6eaBRbR6LoKTlgiQnu///Ajo= Received: by 10.49.8.10 with SMTP id l10mr364212nfi; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.206.9 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 00:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9e3862d80608080057j6810be06q79e868b4561b8649@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:57:11 +1000 From: "Brett Porter" To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [rant] seperate policy change from proposal discussion In-Reply-To: <1155023245.5848.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060808062417.GC29867@bali.sjc.webweaving.org> <1155023245.5848.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +42 (which, I believe, is also the average number of messages per single thread on this list at the moment). Anyway, I'm definitely in agreement with "versioning" policy. Podlings should comply to the latest agreed set at the time of entry, and then a more recent one on graduation (so even if something comes up on the way in, there's time to resolve it before they go out). I agree with the idea of a separate list of proposals, but could take it or leave it. Cheers, Brett On 08/08/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > ABSOLUTELY +1! I also feel really terrible about our "unprofessionalism" > when it comes to handling proposals. > > +1 for another list for proposal submissions- proposal@incubator.a.o and > for this to remain for the current purpose. > > Sanjiva. > > On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 23:24 -0700, Leo Simons wrote: > > > > It must be sooo frustrating for new projects coming in. They read the > > websites, read the mail archives, talk to loads and loads of people, > > and when they think they get it all right they send in a proposal. And > > then, more often than not, someone somewhere within the ASF sees > > "something" that is somehow wrong, and off we go to institute a new > > "rule" on the fly to make the new proposal somehow "invalid". > > > > The latest example is all the debate surrounding whether or not the > > "glasgow" name is appropriate. Up until about a week or two ago, it > > certainly was accepted practice (just look around), and now 'suddenly' > > there's messiness. Its ok if opinions change (we had a loooong debate > > a few years ago about "geronimo" as a name and that made it), but it > > must be very confusing. > > > > Perhaps we should try and seperate this somewhat more rigidly. Eg we > > could have a "released" version of all the things we want a project to > > do and/or comply with (this is our website) and we could have an > > "in progress" version of the same thing (this is what changes more > > rapidly). And *new proposals should be evaluated against the "released" > > one*. > > > > Interested or concerned ASF members popping up out of the blue every > > now and then (Re: the threads on members@ about this) should then be > > restricting themselves to discussing the general case, so that specific > > ones can be somewhat less contentious at the start, which is probably > > quite healthy from a community-building point of view. Communities > > starting off ever so slightly irritated at on-the-fly rulemaking seems > > an unhealthy thing. > > > > Perhaps we should have two mailing lists. > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > LSD > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > -- Apache Maven - http://maven.apache.org "Better Builds with Maven" book - http://library.mergere.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org