Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <44EE4A9F.7010100@rowe-clan.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:55:59 -0500
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060808)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: -1 votes on proposals need no explanation was Re: [VOTE] Accept
 Wicket into the Incubator
References: <5c902b9e0608240938g3e145707k5343dbaeffa838b9@mail.gmail.com>
 <44EE25EA.7000204@odoko.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <44EE25EA.7000204@odoko.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Upayavira wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>> FYI: this is a majority vote not subject to vetos.  So, there's no
>> requirement that you provide a reason for voting against it - just
>> like you don't have to provide a reason why you're voting for it.  If
>> you want to provide a reason, great, but I could just vote against it
>> without further comment and that's perfectly fine too.  -- justin
> 
> Okay. Thanks for the clarification. I'll try to remember that for the
> next podling I propose :-)

Although... an explanation can go a long way to have other pmc members
consider the issues, good and bad, that they might have overlooked.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org