Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72319 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2006 17:34:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Aug 2006 17:34:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 89564 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2006 17:34:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89454 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2006 17:34:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89443 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2006 17:34:40 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:34:40 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [63.246.7.148] (HELO mail.maven.org) (63.246.7.148) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:34:39 -0700 Received: (qmail 2923 invoked by uid 89); 16 Aug 2006 17:34:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?????.??????IPv6:::1?) (jason@maven.org@127.0.0.1) by mail.maven.org with ESMTPA; 16 Aug 2006 17:34:18 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <44E1F5E2.3020806@pobox.com> References: <000f01c6bc06$20698610$1200080a@kepler> <44DA8693.2010106@rowe-clan.net> <31cc37360608100945k1498b28el1aa03228498a1524@mail.gmail.com> <20060810215236.GA65774@bali.sjc.webweaving.org> <386DDF71-43A6-4FAD-B5CF-285705EC6D76@jaguNET.com> <5ec229170608142316t3aadfdb4h3c97bfb24f2c2a74@mail.gmail.com> <5ec229170608150202o58da1bcdoe5a5ad1a452070c7@mail.gmail.com> <96BC792A-9DC2-4D30-A185-B0868FA2423F@holsman.net> <44E1E11C.8030202@servoy.com> <44E1F5E2.3020806@pobox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <069AE0A9-1847-43F9-8FF3-B6DD86E4EEB1@maven.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jason van Zyl Subject: Re: IRC Channel? Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:33:48 -0400 To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 15 Aug 06, at 12:27 PM 15 Aug 06, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > > > Jan Blok wrote: >> Hi, >> >> What could be the problem of any real-time communication medium usage >> between some community members as long as every one agrees code and >> design decisions are made on the mailing list? > > Because the reality is that decisions are made on IRC, implicitly. > It's > hard to engage in an argument that already happened, especially > when the > discussion was very conversational rather than formal : > > A: what do you think? > B: Well, like you said before... > A : about the contstructor > B : no, the other thing > A : related to using =? > B : right that it.. it would be better if that was done as Jim > suggested.... > > versus the more formal statements people make in email > > "I'm beginning to agree that ensuring that re-serializing the > Properties > preserves the original delimiter ("=" in Jim's example) that was > used in > the original file." > That's a sweeping generalization which in many cases is not true. Email can be just as unclear and people going "Sorry, I don't understand what you just said" happens often. In IRC where you can iterate to the point of understanding and pastebin examples to get your point across works very well. I don't think the argument can be made that one form of communication has a better rate of conveyance. I would say IRC does, you would say email does. I think the argument here is one of persons/groups being excluded or not which is matter of project members' attitudes about inclusion. Jason. > geir > > >> >> Regards Jan Blok >> >> >> >> Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>> I think one way of looking at this is simply remembering that >>> the ASF values community over code. Yes, IRC and other >>> real-time communication methods means "quicker" code >>> development, etc, but it places, IMO, an undue barrier >>> to the development of the community. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > Jason van Zyl jason@maven.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org