incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "robert burrell donkin" <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Re: -1 votes on proposals need no explanation was Re: [VOTE] Accept Wicket into the Incubator
Date Sun, 27 Aug 2006 09:25:36 GMT
On 8/25/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Upayavira wrote:
> > Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> >> FYI: this is a majority vote not subject to vetos.  So, there's no
> >> requirement that you provide a reason for voting against it - just
> >> like you don't have to provide a reason why you're voting for it.  If
> >> you want to provide a reason, great, but I could just vote against it
> >> without further comment and that's perfectly fine too.  -- justin
> >
> > Okay. Thanks for the clarification. I'll try to remember that for the
> > next podling I propose :-)
>
> Although... an explanation can go a long way to have other pmc members
> consider the issues, good and bad, that they might have overlooked.

+1

anyone feel like stepping up to add the content of this thread to
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/pmc.html...?

- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message