incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <>
Subject Re: -1 votes on proposals need no explanation was Re: [VOTE] Accept Wicket into the Incubator
Date Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:55:59 GMT
Upayavira wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>> FYI: this is a majority vote not subject to vetos.  So, there's no
>> requirement that you provide a reason for voting against it - just
>> like you don't have to provide a reason why you're voting for it.  If
>> you want to provide a reason, great, but I could just vote against it
>> without further comment and that's perfectly fine too.  -- justin
> Okay. Thanks for the clarification. I'll try to remember that for the
> next podling I propose :-)

Although... an explanation can go a long way to have other pmc members
consider the issues, good and bad, that they might have overlooked.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message