incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <>
Subject Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects
Date Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:51:51 GMT

Jukka Zitting wrote:

> I think the question boils down to the issue of what will happen to
> the Jini standard now that the JDP has been closed down. It's correct
> to insist in that the standard shouldn't be developed within the
> implementation project if the goal is to allow independent
> implementations. Thus, there are two options:
> 1) It is decided (by what community?) that there is no need for
> independent implementations, in which case bringing in the project
> with both the implementation and the specifications under the name of
> "Apache Jini" would make sense.
> 2) Independent implementations remains a goal for the Jini standard,
> and a suitably independent body (be it an Apache project, a real
> standardization organization, or whatever) is chartered for the
> maintenance and development of the standard. In this case we bring in
> the JTSK (+ related tools) implementation as an "Apache Something"
> project that focuses on the implementation of the externally defined
> standard.
> I'm personally in favor of option 2, but at this point I think it's
> premature to decide what to do with the Jini standard.

Thanks for summarizing well what I have been advocating.

I think that we should consider the Jini standard separately - we have a
community and a codebase, and should proceed with that now.  Because it
still is a standard we can work on that in parallel if all parties are

I believe therefore that we have now returned to the original
question... what should the name of the new podling be called? :)


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message