incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com>
Subject Re: [rant] seperate policy change from proposal discussion
Date Tue, 08 Aug 2006 18:17:00 GMT
A big +1.  And I also really like the idea that the proposals contain  
the version number they were written against.

-David

On Aug 8, 2006, at 6:34 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:

> On 8/8/06, Leo Simons <mail@leosimons.com> wrote:
>
>> Perhaps we should try and seperate this somewhat more rigidly. Eg we
>> could have a "released" version of all the things we want a  
>> project to
>> do and/or comply with (this is our website) and we could have an
>> "in progress" version of the same thing (this is what changes more
>> rapidly). And *new proposals should be evaluated against the  
>> "released"
>> one*.
>
> +1
>
> This is one of my biggest concerns -- the rapidly changing  
> requirements.
>
> This is easy enough to do as well.  The released version (with a
> release number) is on the public website and the "in progress" version
> could be on the wiki.  Proposals should include the version number
> they were written against.
>
> -- 
>  jaaron
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message