incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gwyn Evans" <gwyn.ev...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Re: [PROPOSAL] Incubate Wicket
Date Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:57:58 GMT
That's the Wicket side of it - anyone have any idea about how long the
incubation period might be expected to take?

/Gwyn

On 29/07/06, Eelco Hillenius <eelco.hillenius@gmail.com> wrote:
> Time scale for Wicket 2.0 is to start out releasing betas within two
> months. We plan to finish Wicket In Action the next few months - say
> october - and we really want the 2.0 API stabilized by then, as we're
> covering 2.0. The major changes we had in mind for 2.0 have been in
> for a few months now, and as we have converted all the core
> components/ projects, and most of the wicket-stuff projects, we have
> good proof everything works (really) well. We are currently discussing
> the last API tweaks, most notably Wicket's models, but once that is
> done and proven, we are ready for beta.
>
> Eelco
>
>
> > As for 2.0, we may well want to release wicket-incubating-2.0-RCx or
> > similar, but I'd have hoped that we'd be out and able to do
> > apache-wicket-2.0 by the time we finalise 2.0.  (Anyone any idea what
> > sort of timescales we might be expecting, by the way).
> >
> > /Gwyn
> >
> > On 27/07/06, Johan Compagner <jcompagner@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > imho, i would much rather see wicket-1.2.2 rather then
> > > > wicket-incubating-1.2.2 as a release. to me incubating says "not ready
for
> > > > production use". it might mean something different in the apache context
> > > > but
> > > > we cant expect all our existing users or those who stumble upon wicket
for
> > > > the first time to enlighten themselves.
> > > >
> > > > so i would rather release on our existing home at sf.net
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes i would also rather see a normal wicket-1.2.2.jar  when we release an
> > > update
> > > to 1.2.x then a incubator name in it.  1.2.2 is a finished release and
> > > incubator
> > > doesn't say finished to me and that i guess goes for a lot of people.
> > >
> > > So i am +1 for option 2.
> > >
> > > And for 2.0 we should then really wait for getting out of incubator. Because
> > > the same rules apply to me. I am not pro for a final release with incubator
> > > in the name.
> > >
> > > johan
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message