incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martijn Dashorst" <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Re: [PROPOSAL] Incubate Wicket
Date Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:40:46 GMT
Sorry for this lengthy response, but I got a negative vibe from
several reactions to this thread and I feel a need to vent my
concerns.

First I am a big fan of Apache and the Apache community. I think that
the way Apache works is a great example of how a community effort can
produce great software. I think that the Wicket community is well on
its way to work in a similar fashion and would be a great addition to
the healthy community found at the ASF. I see several projects inside
ASF already working with Wicket and we always have shown interest in
working with Apache projects or using them.

I saw a quote on the Wicket mailing list stating that 'SF.net is a
repository of open source projects and Apache is a community of people
working on open source projects' (sorry if I didn't quote this
correctly). This means IMO that PEOPLE are more important than
PROCESS. When Wicket is incubated, I fully intend to include as much
people from our community as possible.

Someone suggested to fork the Wicket project into two: one at ASF for
Wicket 2.x and one at our current location (sf.net) for Wicket 1.x. A
forked community parted between 1.x and 2.x would be a disservice to
the Wicket community and I seriously frown upon such a suggestion.
This gives a message to those that they are not considered 'worthy' of
Apache. If the ASF is really concerned with building an open source
community, then the ASF should be working very hard to include
everyone.

The knife cuts both ways: the Wicket community has to bite through
some hard bits, but so does the ASF imo. For us the hard bits will be
the loss of our total freedom to do whatever we want with our
framework (for instance, the possibility to incorporate any (L)GPL
code in our product), a (somewhat) more bureaucratic way of working,
and having to go through the incubation process which is uncertain and
will slow down the project.

I am willing to bite through these bitter parts and join the ASF, but
only if ASF *also* is willing to accept some of Wicket's quirks. One
of those is to be able to build releases for our community, and make
them available at a convenient place with enough bandwidth and with
the quality people expect.

Another is not having to rename all packages (in our 1.x branch) to
org.apache.wicket. Though this is a trivial thing to do, we strive to
keep API changes to a minimum between 1.y releases. Renaming *all*
packages doesn't add value for our users and only creates a major
inconvenience for them. Note that I don't have any problem with
renaming the packages for our 2.x branch to org.apache.wicket.

Martijn

-- 
Download Wicket 1.2.1 now! Embed Wicket components in your portals!
-- http://wicketframework.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message