incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sahan Gamage" <>
Subject Re: [Proposal] Blaze
Date Thu, 20 Jul 2006 01:11:25 GMT
Hi all,

As an Apache committer in the Web services project I would like to
join the initial commiter list of this project.
My work in web services project mainly focuses on transport layer of
Apache Axis2C project as well as implmenting the Apache Sandesha2C
project - an implementation of WS-RM protocol.
I find this project interesting and would like to join the community.
If you guys think that I am worh enough to be an initial committer for
this, please add me to the initial committer list.

- sahan

On 7/20/06, Henri Yandell <> wrote:
> On 7/19/06, Carl Trieloff <> wrote:
> >
> >> Henri said:
> >> This worries me - accepting an implementation whose specification does
> >> not yet have a defined license or containing standards body. Maybe
> >> we've done it before though.
> >
> > This is not true - AMQP has a well defined license and it is posted in
> > the spec, and you can implement
> > the specification freely - without strings.
> Bad wording on my part. I mean the license once it is at the standards body.
> > On the topic of  - at which standards body it will land at, why is that
> > a concern, as the license of
> > the specification is well defined no matter where it goes
> I was assuming that standard bodies dictate the license to a large
> extent, and given that those have caused trouble in the past the idea
> of a new project with that still undefined is a worry. The term
> "standards body" is a mental flag :)
> I asked Cliff as champion about this bit and he said he'd reply here
> in a few hours.
> Hen
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message