incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Holsman <li...@holsman.net>
Subject Re: [Proposal] Blaze
Date Wed, 19 Jul 2006 04:48:36 GMT

On 19/07/2006, at 1:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:

> Ian Holsman wrote:
>
>> isn't Active MQ an alternative to Blaze/AMQP ?
>> If this project was accepted would Apache have *2* different
>> messaging servers?
>
> Ant and Maven?  Axis2 and XFire?  GUMP and Maven Continuum?

I don't see this as a good thing.

how hard would it be for the AMQP protocol to be implemented inside/ 
ontop of ActiveMQ ?


>> which use different protocols ?
>
> Blaze is about only AMQP, a proposed standard for interoperable  
> messaging.
> ActiveMQ implements multiple protocols.  There is some disagreement  
> between
> AMQP proponents and the ActiveMQ team regarding the desirability of
> balkanizing messaging protocols.
>
>> if blaze's goal is to create a standardized widely available and
>> interoperable messaging solution (you forgot enterprise class)
>> why is it creating a new one, and not using JMS ?
>
> Blaze's goal (AMQP) is to provide multple language implementations  
> of a
> language-neutral, wire-level, protocol with a ton of detailed  
> semantics for
> interoperable messaging.  JMS is a a Java API.
>
> 	--- Noel
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

--
Ian Holsman
Ian@Holsman.net
http://economychat.com discussion on the economy and economics in  
general



Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message