Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21666 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2006 03:25:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jun 2006 03:25:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 93600 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2006 03:25:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 93528 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2006 03:25:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 93517 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2006 03:25:09 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 20:25:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [208.30.140.160] (HELO moroha.quovadx.com) (208.30.140.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 20:25:08 -0700 Received: from qxvcexch01.ad.quovadx.com ([192.168.170.59]) by moroha.quovadx.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k533ODDI032053 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2006 03:24:13 GMT Received: from [10.70.3.113] ([10.70.3.113]) by qxvcexch01.ad.quovadx.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 21:24:59 -0600 Message-ID: <4480F4F7.7080908@roguewave.com> Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 20:33:27 -0600 From: Martin Sebor Organization: Rogue Wave Software User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050920 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: STATUS files in podling release References: <997a3eab0605270811s4e7f7c57o8eaa6dbb18775d44@mail.gmail.com> <447C64E3.9030604@roguewave.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jun 2006 03:24:59.0138 (UTC) FILETIME=[4AF88620:01C686BD] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hiram Chirino wrote: > On 5/30/06, Martin Sebor wrote: > >> robert burrell donkin wrote: >> > On 5/27/06, Jeremy Boynes wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> On 5/27/06, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> > Is STATUS appropriate to be bundled in the release? >> >> > >> >> >> >> I had the same question relating to the Tuscany release. In general I >> >> don't think it should as STATUS reflects the state of the project >> >> rather than the code being distributed and technical matters can be >> >> covered in some form of release notes (e.g. README). However, during >> >> incubation, the state of the podling is more likely to be a material >> >> factor for potential users so I would suggest that requiring it to be >> >> included should be part of incubator policy. >> > >> > >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > If others agree I'll volunteer to update the incubator site to reflect >> > that. >> >> I assume we are discussing the status HTML file generated from >> each podling's XML template and not the XML itself, or some >> third document. I.e., this file (to use stdcxx as an example): >> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/stdcxx.html >> > > Actually.. I think the STATUS file that this thread was discussing was > a STATUS file checked into the root of the project's SVN directory. > For example: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/STATUS > > I'm not sure but it may be that this format may have fallen out of > favor for the STATUS version that you described. Yes, I believe that is the case. This STATUS file is not required to exist anymore and from what I've seen most if not all podlings have switched to the required HTML/XML document long time ago. Martin > Part of the problem > is that incubation procedures change with time and someone that was > mentor at one time and comes back to the incubator with a project may > be using old procedures like maintaining STATUS files in the project > root directory. > > In other words, even mentors may get a little of date with the latest > and greatest incubation procedures. I'm not sure it's an easy thing > to solve. > >> FWIW, I see very little on these pages that's relevant (or even >> terribly meaningful) to anyone but the incubator so I'm not sure >> what the average user would get out of it. >> >> In addition, isn't there material on these pages that projects >> are normally not permitted to distribute (except without the >> explicit permission of the board: e.g., the feather)? If it >> became a requirement for podlings to distribute such material >> how would it it affect this usual restriction, and what impact >> would it have on third parties wanting to re-distribute these >> releases? I.e., would it become necessary to remove all such >> non-distributable material before re-distributing a tarball? >> How would the third party know where to look? >> >> If it is felt that it is important to distribute the status >> with the release wouldn't it be easier to include a link >> pointing at the status web page from within the podling's >> README? >> >> Martin >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org