incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "robert burrell donkin" <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Branding of Incubator projects
Date Fri, 30 Jun 2006 09:03:09 GMT
On 6/30/06, robert burrell donkin <robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/29/06, Martin Sebor <sebor@roguewave.com> wrote:
>
> > sophitia que wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I don't think it's unreasonable that we expect proposing parties to at
> > > least browse and read parts of the incubator web site prior to a
> > > submission.  Our obligation, as the incubator, would be to 1) ensure
> > that
> > > any official guidelines we develop are prominently and visibly
> > displayed on
> > > the incubator web site, 2) promote community and cultural processes
> > that
> > > reinforce these practices.
> >
> > I agree. Listing these guidelines or recommendations in a document
> > (or a section of one) specifically designated for third parties
> > wishing to propose a project will be a big help. IMO, the section
> > named Entry To Incubation of the Incubation would be a good place.
> > The Branding Guidelines is where I would tend to look for guidance
> > after my proposal has been accepted but not necessarily until then.
>
>
> interesting...
>
> i'd hope that proposers would read all of the incubator documentation and
> a reasonable percentage of the foundation documentation. perhaps i was being
> optimisitic :-/
>
> a separate entry to incubator document sounds like a good idea.
>

(Doh! sent too early)

but with links into branding and the other documents rather than move the
content.

- robert

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message