incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Sebor <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release
Date Sun, 28 May 2006 19:42:33 GMT
Bruce Snyder wrote:
> On 5/27/06, Jim Jagielski <> wrote:
>> README.txt and userGuide.html (at least) should be updated to
>> reflect Apache ActiveMQ, not just 'ActiveMQ'
>> Is STATUS appropriate to be bundled in the release?
> I've found some information on the STATUS file but I think I'm missing
> something because I can find info about the HTML status file, but
> nothing on the STATUS file checked into the Subversion repo. I'm
> trying to understand the redundancy and your query about
> appropriateness. Below is what I have found:

FWIW, you might find helpful the issues below and the threads they
reference:, and

My understanding is that only one "STATUS file" is required and
that's your project's status web page; the term "STATUS file" is
a holdover from the early days of the incubator when a file with
that name did in fact exist and was required.


> • The Incubator Process Description page states that with an upcoming
> assessment it is generally a good idea to have your STATUS file right
> up to-date 
> (
> • The Incubation Policy page states that every project has an
> incubation status file under
> (

> Could you point out the docs on the difference between the two and the
> appropriateness of the STATUS file?
> Thanks!
> Bruce

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message