Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94987 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2006 16:59:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2006 16:59:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 7426 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2006 16:59:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 7071 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2006 16:59:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 7059 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2006 16:59:51 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:59:51 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of mail@leosimons.com designates 216.218.185.16 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.218.185.16] (HELO bali.sjc.webweaving.org) (216.218.185.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:59:50 -0700 Received: from bali.sjc.webweaving.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bali.sjc.webweaving.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k3BGsDTu049691 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:54:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mail@leosimons.com) Received: (from lsimons@localhost) by bali.sjc.webweaving.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id k3BGs40E049683; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:54:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mail@leosimons.com) X-Authentication-Warning: bali.sjc.webweaving.org: lsimons set sender to mail@leosimons.com using -f Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:54:04 -0700 From: Leo Simons To: general@incubator.apache.org, brightoncomputers@brightontown.com.au Subject: Re: Getting the Incubator PMC to be more responsive Message-ID: <20060411165404.GF42218@bali.sjc.webweaving.org> Mail-Followup-To: Leo Simons , general@incubator.apache.org, brightoncomputers@brightontown.com.au References: <20060410135428.GD9735@bali.sjc.webweaving.org> <200604111216.k3BCGhLe020989@mail.e-wire.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200604111216.k3BCGhLe020989@mail.e-wire.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on bali.sjc.webweaving.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 08:20:00PM +0800, Gav.... wrote: > > I know *I* decided a few weeks ago not to spend any more time at any > > intersection between the wider geronimo community and the incubation stuff > > because its become obvious that my opinion on a variety of stuff doesn't > > mesh well with the apparent consensus within that community. I haven't > > gone so far as to set up an actual ignore filter on > > (activemq|wadi|servicemix|...) but I might as well have. I read your > > message > > sort-of by accident. > > Your opinion may not mesh well at the moment, but it needs to be continued > to be heard I would have thought. Why? Endless discussions just annoy everyone...the ASF is a big place, and there is plenty of room for disagreement. > And your vote is valued as is everyone elses. I don't have a vote on the direction of geronimo or the organisation of its community and I shouldn't have. > If someone raises a vote should it not be compulsory to vote on it in > some kind of way? Most certainly not. > > Maybe other incubator pmc members have a similar mail-reading behaviour. > > This surely is unacceptable behaviour. Excuse me? That's a rather bold statement... > Why else is the Incubator PMC here > but to sort out EVERY Incubator related Issue. The incubator PMC is for oversight of the incubator. PMCs are not there to do work. That's what we have volunteers for (committers and contributors and mentors and more). > Blocking some issues whilst > being active in only what you find interesting is not good is it. There is a difference between what a PMC has to do and what individuals on that PMC have to do. There is also a difference between having no spare time and blocking something. Blocking is when you vote -1, and even then it often isn't blocking. When you're a volunteer, doing what interests you (or what other motiviation you might have) is a perfectly healthy thing. LSD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org