incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Hatcher <e...@ehatchersolutions.com>
Subject Re: Lucene.Net
Date Mon, 17 Apr 2006 11:06:22 GMT
Yes, I added that wiki piece for Lucene.Net.  Please refine it as  
desired.

I'm not clear on your timeline below... when you re-released 1.3-rc3,  
that was with Pasha's codebase, right?  And what about 1.4-alpha -  
was any of that code from Pasha, or was it a from-scratch creation by  
you?

	Erik


On Apr 16, 2006, at 10:25 PM, George Aroush wrote:

> Hi Noel,
>
> I see that Lucene.Net has already been updated
> (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2006) possibly done by Erik.
>
> In regards to the history of Lucene.Net/DotLucene, here is how it  
> went:
> May 2003: 1.3-rc1 was released by Pasha Bizhan
> Dec 2003: 1.3-rc2 was released by Pasha Bizhan
> Sep 2004: 1.3-rc3 was released by Pasha Bizhan
> Sep 2004: 1.3-rc3 went close source and all earlier releases were  
> removed
> from SourceForge.net
> Sep 2004: A new project called DotLucene was created on  
> SourceForge.net
> Sep 2004: I re-released Lucene.Net 1.3-rc3 under the project name  
> DotLucene
> on SourceForge.net
> Oct 2004: 1.4-alpha of Lucene.Net was released by me
> Nov 2004: 1.4-rc1 was released by me
> Dec 2004: 1.4.3-beta was released by me
> Jan 2005: 1.4.3-rc1 was released by me
> Feb 2005: 1.4.3-final was released by me
> May 2005: 1.9-beta was released by me
> Feb 2006: 1.9-rc1 was released by me
>
> As for Dan's documentation, I agree with you -- his terms are not  
> in ASF
> terms so I will say "no" to him.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- George
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 11:31 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Lucene.Net
>
> George,
>
> Yes, a report needs to come from each project.  You can see  
> examples in the
> e-mail archives, or recent ones linked from
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FrontPage.
>
> If you wouldn't mind, I'd like to hear a bit of the history of  
> Lucene.Net.
> It seems that there was Lucene.Net, then it forked with one version  
> becoming
> DotLucene and another becoming closed source.  The former is what  
> came to
> here, according to the status file, but you seem to indicate that  
> not all of
> the participants have come?
>
> I assume that when you refer to "a promotional website for  
> DotLucene set up
> by it's owner, Dan Letecky" you mean that Dan Letecky owns the  
> site.  :-)
>
> And I wouldn't be keen to accept his documentation under his terms.
>
> 	--- Noel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Aroush [mailto:george@aroush.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:07
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
>
>
> Hi Nole,
>
> Is the report for inclusion in this month something you need from  
> me?  If
> so, can you point me to what I need to report on, i.e.: any forms  
> that I
> have to fill.
>
> The IP is cleaned up some time ago (as far as I know if not please  
> advice.)
> At SourceForge.net Lucene.Net (which is known as DotLucene) will no  
> longer
> be supported.  Do I need to do anything at SourceForge.net beside the
> announcement that DotLucene has moved to ASF?
>
> http://www.dotlucene.net/ is just a promotional website for  
> DotLucene set up
> by it's owner, Dan Letecky.  I sent an email to Dan asking if he  
> wants to
> contribute his documentation of Lucene.Net to ASF (which is found  
> here:
> http://www.dotlucene.net/documentation/)  His response was:
>
> "I'm willing to contribute my documentation as long as there is a  
> link back
> to http://www.dotlucene.net on each contributed page. E.g.  
> <p>Contributed by
> <a href="http://www.dotlucene.net">dotlucene.net</a>."
>
> I believe giving credit where it's due, but this maybe too much to  
> ask for.
> In any case, I don't know ASF policy on this regards and if this is
> acceptable.  Please let me know, otherwise I will create and  
> maintain the
> documentations myself.
>
> As for the earlier project going closed-source, that was the case  
> with 1.2.
> However, since I have taken over stating with 1.3 and now that  
> Lucene.Net is
> on ASF, I don't see it gong back to closed-source any more.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- George
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 9:14 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer
>
> Erik,
>
> I'll add a +1.  And please be sure to submit the report for  
> inclusion this
> month.
>
> For my information, I notice that the STATUS file says that this is  
> from the
> DotLucene project on SourceForge.  How are things going with IP  
> clearance?
> And will this web site: http://www.dotlucene.net/ be coming over as  
> the
> project's web site soon?
>
> I see that an earlier Lucence.Net project went closed-source
> (http://searchblackbox.com/lucene/index.html?ldn2).  The only issue  
> I have
> with them at the moment is their implication that they are THE  
> Lucene for
> .net, rather than just A compatible implementation.
>
> 	--- Noel
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message