Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <44198F8F.6090700@toolazydogs.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:17:19 -0800
From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <list@toolazydogs.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ and ServiceMix reports
References: <af2843cd0603151728vdd07ef2n526e8edd8c838ffe@mail.gmail.com>
	 <NBBBJGEAGJAKLIDBKJOPOEIOHBAC.noel@devtech.com>
	 <ec6e67fd0603160054u385c434ayd96880f920c9758e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <19e0530f0603160310n6dc62c83y7066f838a0699df@mail.gmail.com>
	 <ec6e67fd0603160331x1f2c8eb9rdec288650b83627@mail.gmail.com>
 <19e0530f0603160339j19934417q47be16fdbef203cb@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <19e0530f0603160339j19934417q47be16fdbef203cb@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------050901080806020707020406"

--------------050901080806020707020406
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This is my understanding as well and what was communicated to me by 
Incubator PMC people.


Regards,
Alan


Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> I think he is talking about having/needing a separate download for
> ServiceMix irrespective of whether an incubating jar is in Geronimo or
> not.
>
> Basically if one needs servicemix, they get a whole package that has
> incubating all over it. Same with derby, if someone needed derby they
> won't download Geronimo. They will download Derby. Does not mean that
> derby jar should not be in Geronimo. It could be, but needs to be
> marked properly (incubating sth or other in the jar name)
>
> Anyway that is my understanding...
>
> [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-servicemix-dev/200602.mbox/%3c1140235319.25299.24.camel@localhost.localdomain%3e
>
> On 3/16/06, James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> On 3/16/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
>>     
>>> I don't think there is such a restriction. Where did you come across
>>> that? in other words, who said that?
>>>
>>> "we are apparently not allowed to use the incubating ActiveMQ"
>>>       
>> See this thread...
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-servicemix-dev/200602.mbox/%3c1140624251.29199.38.camel@localhost.localdomain%3e
>>
>> I confess that this was a suprise - I'd like clarification if this is
>> actually really the case. It seems silly for the incubation process to
>> actually stop other Apache projects using the code.
>>
>> e.g. I remember us using Apache Derby for a very long time during its
>> incubation on Geronimo - which resulted in some Geronimo folks contributing
>> back to Derby; we also considered its releases to be real things we built
>> software from, not just "milestones". Though I guess back then, Geronimo was
>> still in incubation itself which is why it was maybe allowed to use
>> incubating code?
>>
>> --
>>
>> James
>> -------
>> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>   


--------------050901080806020707020406--